Homecoming Day
Sermon, June 11, 2000
Texts: Luke 15:11-32; Romans 8:22-27
Many of you are old enough to remember the title heavyweight bout between Sonny Liston and Cassius Clay (who later changed his name to Muhammad Ali) in the early sixties; I remember as a young boy sitting with my father and brothers around the radio as we listened to the final rounds. As Clay won that match, the sports world was introduced to the much imitated, but never matched, colorful and megalomaniac ego of Clay as he exuberantly bellowed again and again, "I'm the champ! I'm the king of the world!" There's a story told about Ali (then Clay) that took place not long after that bout; unfortunately, I haven't been able to verify whether it is a true story or not. It was reported that he was on board a commercial flight, and the flight attendant walked down the aisle reminding people to buckle their seat belts before takeoff. Clay sat there with his seatbelt unbuckled, and in mock defiance said to the flight attendant, "Superman don't need no seatbelt." The flight attendant didn't miss a beat; she responded, "Champ, Superman don't need no plane. You buckle up."
It's a bit of a stretch, but one might say that Ali wanted the benefits of riding the plane without being strapped in to the obligations of riding a plane...if that flight met severe turbulence or worse, "Superman" would have found out in a hurry just how vulnerable he was! This morning we'll be taking a look at a boy who may have thought he was "Super Son;" this young man who seems to have wanted all the benefits of sonship without being "strapped into" the obligations of sonship. We began our look at this parable from Luke last week. As you remember, there was a man who had two sons. The younger son said, "Father, give me my share of the estate." So the father divided his property between the sons. Now, I'm told there were no laws or customs among the Jews or the Arabs which entitled the son to a share of the father's wealth while the father is still alive. None. This request would be seen by Jesus' original audience as an extraordinary insult to the father, and it would have hurt the father deeply. The implication of this young son's request is, "Father, I can't wait for you to die. I just want what you have; I don't want you. I want the goodies ... all the benefits and blessings of being your child ... I just don't want you. I don't want to live under your roof and I don't want to live by your rules and I don't want to associate with your family, especially my stuffy older brother, and I can manage things just fine if you'll just give me what I want."
(Or, to paraphrase the words of Clay, "Super-son don't need no father!"). Again, the son's request is all but unheard of in the culture of that time. Again, it's tantamount to requesting the father to die.(An aside that was edited out of the original delivery of the sermon: Remember, in this parable the father represents God. Draw the parallels; have we ever made similar requests directly or indirectly? "I want all the benefits and blessings of being your child, God, except that I don't want the obligations. I don't want to live by your rules, I don't want to associate with your people, especially those stuffy Presbyterians, and I can manage things just fine if you'll just give me what I want." )
So this son requests his portion of the family inheritance while his father is yet alive. This is a deeply insulting and hurtful request, for it carries the unmistakable inference that the son just wants the father out of the picture. He wants only the father's goodies, and not the father. He wants what the father can give him; but he wants nothing to do with the father or the father's family or the household obligations. He wants his share of the family goodies for himself to manage and use as he pleases. The Middle Eastern audience listener would expect the father to refuse and severely punish the boy. Instead, the request is granted. Let's look now at verse 13, "Not many days later..." It wouldn't take long for the word to spread in this Middle Eastern community about the son's treacherous request. The young man would probably be greeted at every turn with amazement, horror and rejection. The typical Middle Eastern village was a very close, tight-knit community; each and every member of this community would take each and every opportunity to express disapproval to this young man who acted so shamelessly.
As Jesus tells the story, this young man quickly packs up, and goes far, far away, possibly to get away from the rejection, criticism and condemnation of the home village, and perhaps to enjoy the cloak of anonymity in another place. Maybe he just wishes to put distance between himself and his father, whom he has deeply grieved and offended. He goes off to a distant country, wastefully ("prodigally") spends and squanders all his money, which was half of what appears to be a very sizable estate. This far country then undergoes a famine. The young man attaches himself to an apparently well-off citizen who has food and livestock during the famine. Jesus' Jewish audience knew just how far this young man had sunk when they hear the job he has taken: he is tending pigs. This is a job that would be anathema to anyone of Jewish heritage, as pigs were unclean animals. A Jew in that era would have the same inner revulsion for pigs you or I would have for a dead animal lying on the side of the road; he wouldn't touch one pig, let alone work with a herd of pigs. This young man is obviously at the end of his rope; Superman's "plane" has crashed. As we pick up in verse 16, we find him miserable, broke, starving, living with the pigs and probably like a pig; in fact, he is dependent upon pigs for his income
(some of you may be thinking, "I've had jobs like that!"). If Jesus was telling a simple morality story, this could very well be the end of the story, with the moral being "You act like a pig and you will end up like a pig!" For many in the audience, the story could have ended right there!But we know the story doesn't end there. As we read in verses 17-19, the young man "comes to his senses." He faces his miserable state, he takes stock of his position, and decides his only hope is to try to go back to the father. Now, is this young man genuinely sorry, or is he just sorry because he's miserable, like the adulterer or perjurer who was sorry he got "caught?" Does it genuinely grieve this young man that he deeply hurt his father and that he blew half of the family estate, this estate earned by hard work by his father, or is he just miserable because he is broke and hungry? We can't know for sure; Jesus doesn't tell us. We know there are many people who want to be saved from their misery, but it doesn't necessarily follow that they want to be saved from the sin that caused their misery! There are certainly those who seek rescue without repentance; it's quite possible this young man is one of them.
You see, there were basically three types of servants at that time and place in history and culture: The three types were a bondsman, a slave and a hired servant. 1. The Bondsman. A Bondsman is part of the family estate and almost a part of the family. He is bound to the family, and often marked with a pierced ear carrying the ring of ownership. 2. The Slave. Lower class slaves are subordinate to the bondsmen; they are the servants of the servants. 3. The Hired Servant. The hired servants are contracted laborers. They work shifts, they are free to go home at the end of the day; they are paid. They are outsiders to the home. A hired servant is a free man with his own income living independently of the employer. While he is at work, he is a servant...but when his shift is over, he is his own man. Hired servants come, do their thing, and go their own way at the end of the day. Now, what does the young man plan to say to his father? Verse 18.
"I will set out and go back to my father and say to him: Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me like one of your hired men." It is quite possible this wily young man may be conniving here...he may be devising a strategy where he can still enjoy some of the benefits the father has to offer, but still keep a safe "distance." As a hired servant, he won't have to live with his brother. As a hired servant, he won't have to always live under his father's rules, he will only relate to his father as a "boss" rather than as a father. This son seeks only to serve "on Sundays and at committee meetings" if you will; he seeks to remain independent, he seeks to remain his own man. As we will see, the father will have none of that. Like the father in this parable, the Heavenly Father wants family members, not part-time servants; He wants sons and daughters, not hired hands...but I'm getting ahead of myself a bit. Again, we don't know this young man's real motivations...Jesus doesn't say. All we know is that the young man is desperate. He is miserable, he is broke, he is starving, he is living like a pig, he is suffering, and however impure his motivations may or may not be, he determines to go back to the father. And when the father sees his son coming, he runs down the road to meet him!Now the audience is really surprised. What in the world is this father doing? Not only is he openly and publicly welcoming this shameless son, he is running! In public! Middle Eastern noblemen just didn't DO that; it was considered scornful and humiliating for a respectable man to be seen running in public (contrary to the view of our modern, health-conscious culture where our CEO's, our movie stars and even our presidents are often photographed jogging). The middle eastern nobleman with flowing robes never runs anywhere; as one first century scholar-historian wrote, "It is so very undignified in Eastern eyes for an older man to run." Even the great Aristotle once wrote, "Great men never run in public." Such an action on the behalf of this nobleman would certainly draw attention; by drawing such attention to himself in this culturally humiliating way, it is quite conceivable that the father intended to draw the attention of the village away from the son and onto himself. This is an extraordinarily gracious act on behalf of the father. You can now better imagine how the son feels...having steeled himself for rejection, he stares in utter amazement as his father comes running down the road, publicly, toward him. The father makes the reconciliation public; and the son enters the village under the protective care of the father's acceptance. He orders the best robe put on the boy; the father's robe will ensure acceptance by the community...this son is to be part of the family again and is to be treated as such.
It seems that the son is so overwhelmed by his father's gracious acceptance that he does not finish his rehearsed speech! Verse 21: "The son said to him, `Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son." Period. End of sentence. He doesn't go on to offer his "services" as a hired hand; he is simply repentant. It is quite possible that he is so overwhelmed by the experience of his father's love and grace that he is now sincerely and genuinely and thoroughly repentant. He is now really sorry. I think he now realizes just how thoroughly shameful he really was, and how undeserving he really is. Does the son deserve this extraordinary demonstration of fatherly love? Hardly. But that is the essence of God's grace, isn't it? There is a bittersweet edge to it...sweet, in that even the smallest genuine experience of God's grace and love is overwhelmingly precious; bitter, in that there is deep shame and pain that comes when one realizes just how undeserving of grace he or she really is.
The father won't have anything to do with this hired servant nonsense. The father doesn't want a hired hand, he wants to restore a son. He wants the son to live under his roof, in fellowship with his siblings, he wants to restore the son to a respected place in the community, and above all else, the father wants his son to experience the fullness of the father's love, grace, generosity and joy. We'll continue with our look at this parable next time.